How the government ruled that doubts about vaccine safety, true or untrue, cannot be allowed to exist in view to ensure public health objectives are met, aka profit is made.
You are consistently one of the most informative individuals on twitter/X and rarely if ever traffic in distractions or red herrings.
I'm currently working on a very lengthy series of articles which covers in detail all vaccines on the childhood schedule.
As part of this I get into the history of the "diseases" that are ostensibly addressed by these injections as well as the political and economic forces at play.
One of the more consistent themes is that directly preceding whatever is the "disease du jour" for the upcoming "new and essential" vaccine, there comes a mass media blitz that has to conince the public that such a disease exists and it is an existential threat.
For example, you go back to the 60's-70's in the US virtually noone knows that there is such a thing as HepB (that there is no such disease is another story) and the few that are aware of it understand it to of no threat to anyone except drug addicts (first clue there is no such disease).
It's not until the "discovery and mechanism" for this vaccine comes into play that this disease becomes a "public health concern" courtesy of the usual suspects (CDC, FDA, NIH and their bought off Pharma scientists and "experts").
The media machinery kicks into gear and voila the public is convinced there is bogeyman coming to get them.
It is not only about money, it's about politics. It is not a coincidence that all these erroneous interventions lead to lower health, lower IQ, more disease and shorter life with increased suffering. This is the depopulation and control agenda that is the primary objective that is being achieved step by step.
Indeed. So many vectors coalesced in the early 1900s. The use of fluoride into aluminum in vaccines was a major drop to IQ, due to their biochemical interactions in the brain.
It's actually been happening for well over a century. The Flexner Report set the stage and made them realise that they could dictate medicine through regulatory process, (among other things), control what "public health" was and even determine "science" by PR, rather than actual science. Personally, I think even Machiavelli understood that perception is everything. The masses are controlled by the few, by perception. Not brute strength, intellect or armies but by presenting their dictate as safety and "for the common good". But 🤷♀️ JMO.😉
Well said. I need to write an article about the flexner report and how the medical system was birthed. Really important history, with the ideologies of the rockefellers and carnegies exposed with it (eugenics).
What's the source for this? I don't do twitter or I would ask in that thread. Keep up the great work.
"It should be a matter of concern that a recent freedom of information act request (FOIA Case Number 50882, and HHS Appeal No.; 19-0083-AA) revealed that the NIH were unable to provide a single study relied upon by them in relation to the safety of injection of aluminum adjuvants in infants."
You are consistently one of the most informative individuals on twitter/X and rarely if ever traffic in distractions or red herrings.
I'm currently working on a very lengthy series of articles which covers in detail all vaccines on the childhood schedule.
As part of this I get into the history of the "diseases" that are ostensibly addressed by these injections as well as the political and economic forces at play.
One of the more consistent themes is that directly preceding whatever is the "disease du jour" for the upcoming "new and essential" vaccine, there comes a mass media blitz that has to conince the public that such a disease exists and it is an existential threat.
For example, you go back to the 60's-70's in the US virtually noone knows that there is such a thing as HepB (that there is no such disease is another story) and the few that are aware of it understand it to of no threat to anyone except drug addicts (first clue there is no such disease).
It's not until the "discovery and mechanism" for this vaccine comes into play that this disease becomes a "public health concern" courtesy of the usual suspects (CDC, FDA, NIH and their bought off Pharma scientists and "experts").
The media machinery kicks into gear and voila the public is convinced there is bogeyman coming to get them.
It's the same playbook every time.
It is not only about money, it's about politics. It is not a coincidence that all these erroneous interventions lead to lower health, lower IQ, more disease and shorter life with increased suffering. This is the depopulation and control agenda that is the primary objective that is being achieved step by step.
Indeed. So many vectors coalesced in the early 1900s. The use of fluoride into aluminum in vaccines was a major drop to IQ, due to their biochemical interactions in the brain.
I got so much to write about.
Persever, the world needs to know!
It's actually been happening for well over a century. The Flexner Report set the stage and made them realise that they could dictate medicine through regulatory process, (among other things), control what "public health" was and even determine "science" by PR, rather than actual science. Personally, I think even Machiavelli understood that perception is everything. The masses are controlled by the few, by perception. Not brute strength, intellect or armies but by presenting their dictate as safety and "for the common good". But 🤷♀️ JMO.😉
Well said. I need to write an article about the flexner report and how the medical system was birthed. Really important history, with the ideologies of the rockefellers and carnegies exposed with it (eugenics).
And let's not forget about the under-reporting factor, as only a minimum is reported and recorded!!!
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-95e
https://open.substack.com/pub/maryann255/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-080?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
What's the source for this? I don't do twitter or I would ask in that thread. Keep up the great work.
"It should be a matter of concern that a recent freedom of information act request (FOIA Case Number 50882, and HHS Appeal No.; 19-0083-AA) revealed that the NIH were unable to provide a single study relied upon by them in relation to the safety of injection of aluminum adjuvants in infants."